False Statement 1
“Once on scene, the officer did not then check windscreens for disabled badges as this was not relevant to the call that she was responding to. The officer simply wanted to confirm or negate the fact that people were protesting.”
The true conversation:
PC Hobby Bobby: “You know you are parked in a disabled bay?
Disabled Pensioner: “Yes”
PC Hobby Bobby: Have you got a blue badge”
Disabled Pensioner: ” Yes, in the front”
At this point I arrive on the scene.
Both the disabled pensioner and a witness are willing to state the above on oath.
False Statement 2
“The officer did not apologise to persons present because she did not feel that she had done anything wrong.”
I have a recording in which PC Hobby Bobby states “She would not apologise to the lady on account of my recording events.”
In addition there are numerous witnesses to the conversation.
Polite Offer To Lindsey
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 2:24 PM
To: Stamp, Lindsey
Subject: Re: Not A Complaint [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
Could I please refer you to https://andystrangeway.wordpress.com/2016/01/02/are-north-yorks-police-dishonest/
To save Police resources, and to prevent further humiliation of North Yorks Police, I would like to politely suggest that PC Hobby Bobby and yourself revisit your response.
If you chose to decline my offer to deal with this informally, please forward full details of the North Yorks Complaints Procedure, this to include an email address.
If Lindsey declines to deal with this issue via the informal process I will have no option than to make a formal complaint.
The complaint will necessitate the publishing on my conversation with PC Hobby Bobby on YouTube. This will prove beyond doubt the False Statement 2.
With regards False Statement 1 – two people are willing to make statements on oath.